Every Picture Is a Compromise
Lessons from the Also-rans
Most photography websites show the photographer's very best work. Wonderful. But that's not the full story of a creative life. If we want to learn, we'd better pay attention to the images that aren't "greatest hits" and see what lessons they have to offer. Every picture is a compromise — the sum of its parts, optical, technical, visual, emotional, and even cosmic – well, maybe not cosmic, but sometimes spiritual. Success on all fronts is rare. It's ok to learn from those that are not our best.
This is a series about my also-rans, some of which I've been able to improve at bit (i.e., "best effort"), none of which I would consider my best. With each there are lessons worth sharing, so I will.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a361/9a3616be49d57b3a5045557d0bac6717936e2f60" alt=""
Previous image | Next image |
Original digital capture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e67/b8e67c5c8323b028ce9e26f251863db4302e744f" alt=""
What I saw that I liked:
A magnificent bird, photographed by a questionable technique.
What I don't like in the picture:
Is it the camera's fault that the ocean is in focus and bird is not? Or is it all a failure of the photographer? (Hint: cameras do what they are told to do.)
What I learned:
As this magnificent creature swooped by me over and over, I gathered a dozen or so blurry wingspans. And then I remembered that my technically advanced camera has a feature that will focus specifically on birds. I'd never used that feature before, but I found it in the menu system on screen 864 where the little bird icon was. The image at left was the first one attempted with "bird focus." So is this a success of the camera or a success of the photographer? Why, the photographer of course! Take credit for your successes and blame equipment for your failures — at least that's my motto.
2nd Chances: What I might try next
Read the damned camera manual. |
|